I will keep it as *A. longipes* for the time being, as suggested by Tapas ji.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 21:39, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks a lot, Tapas ji > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 20:01, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Garg ji, >> Such a report could be based on misidentification only. Without flowers >> or fruits we can distinguish A. reticulata, identifiable by the prominent >> minor venation of leaves on both surfaces of leaves. But here we can see >> obscure minor venation of the leaves, characteristic of A. longipes. >> Moreover, true A. reticulata is confined to the Khasi hills and reports >> outside Meghalaya might be misidentifications, in my opinion. >> The situation can be clarified decisively only when the flowers and >> fruits are made available. >> >> With regards, >> Tapas >> >> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 17:42 J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Tapas ji. >>> There is only one specimen >>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.1790333%2Fformat%2Flarge> >>> of this in GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/4177419> and it looks >>> different to me. >>> *Actinodaphne reticulata* Meisn. has been reported in the Checklist of >>> Nepal. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 17:35, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I beg to differ. I think the samples posted by Saroj ji should belong >>>> to Actinodaphne longipes Kosterm. which is possibly unrecorded for Nepal. >>>> Anyway, for fomally reporting the occurrence of the species from Nepal, we >>>> need flowering or fruiting material and herbarium specimens. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Tapas >>>> >>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 17:02 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you Mr. Garg ! >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 4:55 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I also feel more close to Actinodaphne reticulata Meisn. as per GBIF >>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=4176958> >>>>>> specimens (one >>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1441303198529LMrNzbkxauXyBV29>, >>>>>> two >>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm38e5a0276-4972-4d2e-ae19-d881c1561f61>, >>>>>> three >>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fquod.lib.umich.edu%2Fcgi%2Fi%2Fimage%2Fapi%2Fimage%2Fherb00ic%3A1500468%3AMICH-V-1500468%2Ffull%2Fres%3A0%2F0%2Fnative.jpg> >>>>>> ). >>>>>> Looks different from Actinodaphne sikkimensis Meisn. as per efi page >>>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2018/07/14/actinodaphne-sikkimensis/> and >>>>>> GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=4176753> >>>>>> specimens. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 13:13, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it mentioned Phulchoki also. However, the tree had fallen and >>>>>>> I am not sure If I can >>>>>>> find another tree to follow up for the flowering and fruiting ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:18 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK Tapas Da! >>>>>>>> I am not Da but a junior😉! >>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:15 PM Tapas Chakrabarty < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Saroj da, >>>>>>>>> Would you please read our publication on Actinodaphne and point >>>>>>>>> out where we erred? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sincere regards, >>>>>>>>> Tapas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, 12:49 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Tapas Da ! >>>>>>>>>> A. sikkimensis is not yet recorded from Kathmandu Valley, >>>>>>>>>> however, A. reticulata is recorded in >>>>>>>>>> many localities in the valley and particularly. Phulchoki ! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:46 PM Tapas Chakrabarty < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The whorled leaves and the terminal perulate buds indeed point >>>>>>>>>>> to Actinodaphne. However, in my opinion, A. reticulata is best >>>>>>>>>>> treated as a >>>>>>>>>>> rare endemic confined to the Khasi hills in Meghalaya. I think the >>>>>>>>>>> present >>>>>>>>>>> images should be compared with A. sikkimensis. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, 12:12 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Actinodaphne reticulata *Meisn. ?? Herbarium image from >>>>>>>>>>>> nearby location. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fidentify.plantnet.org%2Fru%2Fthe-plant-list%2Fspecies%2FActinodaphne%2520longipes%2520Kosterm.%2Fdata&psig=AOvVaw2W3qn5h8fLOEwsMm-T0TOo&ust=1679121425740000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CBAQjRxqFwoTCOCW8PKs4v0CFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:08 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, appears to be from lauraceae. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can it be some Actinodaphne >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/01/actinodaphne/> species. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried as per the Checklist of Nepal >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=100442>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but could not find any match. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 13:48 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: SK 3703 15 March 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu Valley, NepalDate: 11 March >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2023Altitude: 2418m.Habitat : Wild * >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lauraceae ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> With regards, >>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCNKO-R2hY%2BhWY_vbsZ8C8g1PYiqiF1w9Qzt3bKzevr0Q%40mail.gmail.com.
