Thank you sir for the clarification. As I do not have access to Flora of Maharashtra, I am waiting for Neiljis mail with conclusion.
Regards, Giby On 13 January 2012 09:26, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Giby ji & Neil > > This is yet another case where The Plant List seemed to have bungled, > recently I sent them a list of more than 80 species described in FBI, > reported in IPNI and missing from the Plant List. > > The name mentioned by Neil was published as > *Actinodaphne* *gullavara* ( > Buch.-Ham.<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idAuthorSearch.do;jsessionid=2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923?id=1242-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3D2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DActinodaphne%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal> > ex > Nees<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idAuthorSearch.do;jsessionid=2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923?id=6888-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3D2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DActinodaphne%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal> > ) > M.R.Almeida<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idAuthorSearch.do;jsessionid=2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923?id=30797-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3D2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DActinodaphne%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal> > Fl. > Maharashtra<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPublicationSearch.do;jsessionid=2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923?back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3D2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DActinodaphne%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal&id=20000035-1> > 4A: 251. 2003 and duly recorded in IPNI > Now the important question, is whether above is the correct name or > Actinodaphne angustifolia *Actinodaphne* *angustifolia* (Blume) > Nees<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923?id=462206-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3D2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DActinodaphne%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal> > -- Pl. Asiat. Rar. (Wallich). 3: 31. 1832 [15 Jan 1832] based on *Litsea > * *angustifolia* Blume Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. 11: 566. 1826 [24 Jan > 1826]<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=A27983E94E71E82D633A675F18A01A30?id=465508-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3D2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DActinodaphne%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal> > . > > Flora of British India clearly excludes Blume's synonym from the name and > Indian plant is as given in IPNI *Actinodaphne* *angustifolia* Hook.f. & > Thomson ex > Meisn.<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923?id=462205-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3D2274751C59F531352FC966B4D5B27923%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DActinodaphne%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal> > -- Prodr. (DC.) 15(1): 218. 1864 [May 1864]. with Laurus gullavara > Buch.-Ham. as synonym. Since A. angustifolia Hook.f. & T. is a later > homonym of A. angustifolia (Blume) Nees, it can't be maintained and > Actinodaphne gullavara (Buch.-Ham) M R Almeida should be the accepted name. > > I have not gone through Flora Maharastra, and I request Neil ji to check > for the justification given in Fl. Maharashtra when this combination was > published. This is my analysis of what I could explore. > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Neil Soares <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Dr.Giby, >> Thanks for your feedback. Have quoted from Dr.Almeida's 'Flora of >> Maharashtra' Vol 4-A. Actinodaphne gullavara [syn. A. augustifolia, syn. >> A.hookeri] is the only species of Actinodaphne found in Maharashtra. >> With regards, >> Neil Soares. >> >> --- On *Thu, 1/12/12, Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]>* wrote: >> >> >> From: Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:103861] Re: identification of Actinodaphne >> angustifolia >> To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "shrikant ingalhalikar" <[email protected]>, "efloraofindia" < >> [email protected]>, "Prashant awale" <[email protected]>, >> "Satish Nikam" <[email protected]>, "navendu page" < >> [email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 11:33 PM >> >> >> Dear Neil ji, >> >> Interesting! >> I couldn't find *Actinodaphne gullavara* in both "the plant list" or >> "GRIN" >> There are 3 different *Actinodaphne angustifolia *listed in the plant >> list @ http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/search?q=actinodaphne >> First one is *Actinodaphne angustifolia* Nees is an accepted name with >> *Laurus >> gullavara* Buch.-Ham. ex Nees as a synonym ( but not *A. gullavara).* >> Second one is *Actinodaphne angustifolia* Benth. listed here as >> illegitimate and unresolved >> The third one is *Actinodaphne angustifolia* Hook.f. & Thomson ex Meisn. >> as a synonym of *Actinodaphne hookeri* Meisn. >> Further, in GRIN *A. hookeri* is listed as a synonym of *A. angustifolia. >> * >> Now it is getting confused. >> I feel that the leaves of the plant in this thread and the pictures in >> the link provided by Neilji looks little different. >> Unless we handle the specimen it would be hard to conclude, I think. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> Giby >> >> >> >> >> On 12 January 2012 18:40, Neil Soares >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Affirmative. This is Actinodaphne gullavara. Have had a previous >> discussion on this and it is available at this link : >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/df392de7a2165bed/52a541fbd2f49b71?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=Actinodaphne+gullavara+Neil+Soares#52a541fbd2f49b71 >> >> With regards, >> Neil Soares. >> >> --- On *Thu, 1/12/12, Giby Kuriakose >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> >* wrote: >> >> >> From: Giby Kuriakose >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:103861] Re: identification of Actinodaphne >> angustifolia >> To: "shrikant ingalhalikar" >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Cc: "efloraofindia" >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>, >> "Prashant awale" >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>, >> "Satish Nikam" >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 6:30 PM >> >> >> Yes, *Actinodaphne angustifolia *is a synonym of *A. hookeri.* >> * >> * >> Pubescent leaf petiole is an important field character of *A. hookeri* >> Please refer @ >> >> https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/432f5657686dcb84/5e74fdc5b8468ce1?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=actinodaphne+giby#5e74fdc5b8468ce1 >> * * >> * >> * >> >> Regards >> Giby >> >> >> >> On 12 January 2012 18:23, shrikant ingalhalikar >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> I suppose A. angustifolia and A. hookeri are syn. What is the >> difference observed? Regards, Shrikant >> >> On Jan 12, 12:28 pm, Prashant Awale >> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> > Could this be Actinodaphne hookeri .Satish ji, will u pl tell me the >> > location. >> > I had spotted similar plant at the base of Korigad fort (Lonavala >> region) >> > as well as in Matheran Hills. >> > Regards >> > Prashant >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Satish Nikam >> > <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >> >wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Friends, >> > > I am posting the photo of the same tree as last >> year >> > > which was ID'd as Actinodaphne angustifolia.Here is the old link. >> > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwwssncomphotos/5284817799/ >> > > Also some young saplings around.My observation is that their are both >> > > light green leaves as well dark green on the same plant>Experts now >> your >> > > call. >> > >> > > thanks >> > > regards >> > > satish nikam- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> -- >> GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD >> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), >> Royal Enclave, >> Jakkur Post, Srirampura >> Bangalore- 560064 >> India >> Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) >> visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby >> >> >> >> >> -- >> GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD >> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), >> Royal Enclave, >> Jakkur Post, Srirampura >> Bangalore- 560064 >> India >> Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) >> visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby >> >> > > > -- GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Jakkur Post, Srirampura Bangalore- 560064 India Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby
