Hi Prof. Singh & Dr. Giby,
    Not sure what you mean by "justification".  Dr.Almeida has clubbed all the 
aforementioned names under A.gullavara and as usual has included a description 
of the tree and its distribution.
                       With regards,
                         Neil Soares.

--- On Fri, 1/13/12, Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:103924] Re: identification of Actinodaphne 
angustifolia
To: "Gurcharan Singh" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Neil Soares" <[email protected]>, "shrikant ingalhalikar" 
<[email protected]>, "efloraofindia" <[email protected]>, 
"Prashant awale" <[email protected]>, "Satish Nikam" <[email protected]>, 
"navendu page" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, January 13, 2012, 10:14 AM


Thank you sir for the clarification. As I do not have access to Flora of 
Maharashtra, I am waiting for Neiljis mail with conclusion. 




Regards,
Giby







On 13 January 2012 09:26, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

Giby ji & Neil


This is yet another case where The Plant List seemed to have bungled, recently 
I sent them a list of more than 80 species described in FBI, reported in IPNI 
and missing from the Plant List.


The name mentioned by Neil was published as 
Actinodaphne gullavara ( Buch.-Ham. ex Nees ) M.R.Almeida Fl. Maharashtra 4A: 
251. 2003 and duly recorded in IPNI
Now the important question, is whether above is the correct name or 
Actinodaphne angustifolia Actinodaphne angustifolia (Blume) Nees -- Pl. Asiat. 
Rar. (Wallich). 3: 31. 1832 [15 Jan 1832]  based on Litsea angustifolia Blume 
Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. 11: 566. 1826 [24 Jan 1826].


Flora of British India clearly excludes Blume's synonym from the name and 
Indian plant is as given in IPNI Actinodaphne angustifolia Hook.f. & Thomson ex 
Meisn. -- Prodr. (DC.) 15(1): 218. 1864 [May 1864]. with Laurus gullavara 
Buch.-Ham. as synonym. Since A. angustifolia Hook.f. & T. is a later homonym of 
A. angustifolia (Blume) Nees, it can't be maintained and Actinodaphne gullavara 
(Buch.-Ham) M R Almeida should be the accepted name.


I have not gone through Flora Maharastra, and I request Neil ji to check for 
the justification given in Fl. Maharashtra when this combination was published. 
This is my analysis of what I could explore. 


-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 




 


On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Neil Soares <[email protected]> wrote:






Hi Dr.Giby,
 Thanks for your feedback. Have quoted from Dr.Almeida's 'Flora of Maharashtra' 
Vol 4-A. Actinodaphne gullavara [syn. A. augustifolia, syn. A.hookeri] is the 
only species of Actinodaphne found in Maharashtra.

                     With regards,
                       Neil Soares.

--- On Thu, 1/12/12, Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]> wrote:



From: Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:103861] Re: identification of Actinodaphne 
angustifolia
To: "Neil Soares" <[email protected]>
Cc: "shrikant ingalhalikar" <[email protected]>, "efloraofindia" 
<[email protected]>, "Prashant awale" <[email protected]>, "Satish 
Nikam" <[email protected]>, "navendu page" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 11:33 PM





Dear Neil ji,


Interesting! 
I couldn't find Actinodaphne gullavara in both "the plant list" or "GRIN" 
There are 3 different Actinodaphne angustifolia listed in the plant list 
@ http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/search?q=actinodaphne 
First one is Actinodaphne angustifolia Nees is an accepted name with Laurus 
gullavara Buch.-Ham. ex Nees as a synonym ( but not A. gullavara).
Second one is Actinodaphne angustifolia Benth. listed here as illegitimate and 
unresolved
The third one is Actinodaphne angustifolia Hook.f. & Thomson ex Meisn. as a 
synonym of Actinodaphne hookeri Meisn.
Further, in GRIN A. hookeri is listed as a synonym of A. angustifolia. 
Now it is getting confused.  
I feel that the leaves of the plant in this thread and the pictures in the link 
provided by Neilji looks little different. 
Unless we handle the specimen it would be hard to conclude, I think. 






Regards,
Giby






On 12 January 2012 18:40, Neil Soares <[email protected]> wrote:






Hi,
 Affirmative. This is Actinodaphne gullavara. Have had a previous discussion on 
this and it is available at this link :
 
https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/df392de7a2165bed/52a541fbd2f49b71?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=Actinodaphne+gullavara+Neil+Soares#52a541fbd2f49b71
 
                              With regards,
                                Neil Soares.

--- On Thu, 1/12/12, Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:103861] Re: identification of Actinodaphne 
angustifolia
To: "shrikant ingalhalikar" <[email protected]>
Cc: "efloraofindia" <[email protected]>, "Prashant awale" 
<[email protected]>, "Satish Nikam" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 6:30 PM 





Yes, Actinodaphne angustifolia is a synonym of A. hookeri. 


Pubescent leaf petiole is an important field character of A. hookeri
Please refer @
https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/432f5657686dcb84/5e74fdc5b8468ce1?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=actinodaphne+giby#5e74fdc5b8468ce1 
 




Regards
Giby





On 12 January 2012 18:23, shrikant ingalhalikar <[email protected]> wrote:

I suppose A. angustifolia and A. hookeri are syn. What is the
difference observed? Regards, Shrikant


On Jan 12, 12:28 pm, Prashant Awale <[email protected]> wrote:
> Could this be Actinodaphne hookeri .Satish ji, will u pl tell me the
> location.
> I had spotted similar plant at the base of Korigad fort (Lonavala region)
> as well as in Matheran Hills.
> Regards
> Prashant
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Satish Nikam <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
>
> >  Dear Friends,
> >                    I am posting the photo of the same tree as last year
> > which was ID'd as Actinodaphne angustifolia.Here is the old link.
> >http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwwssncomphotos/5284817799/
> > Also some young saplings around.My observation is that their are both
> > light green leaves as well dark green on the same plant>Experts now your
> > call.
>
> > thanks
> > regards
> > satish nikam- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -




-- 
GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), 
Royal Enclave,
Jakkur Post, Srirampura
Bangalore- 560064
India
Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile)
visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby




-- 
GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), 
Royal Enclave,
Jakkur Post, Srirampura
Bangalore- 560064
India
Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile)
visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby








-- 
GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), 
Royal Enclave,
Jakkur Post, Srirampura
Bangalore- 560064
India
Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile)
visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby

Reply via email to