I think there should be little difficulty in getting correct identity if
Aarti ji remembers major aspects of the plant. Leaves are very small in B.
krugii

Bauhinia monandra (syn: B. krugii)              Bauhinia x blakeana
1. Leaves 2.5-4 cm long.                            1.  Leaves 9-13 cm long
2. Flowers in a short raceme.                     2. Flowers in a large
panicle
3. Fertile stamen 1.                                   3. Fertile stamens
5, 3 longer.
4. Pod formed.                                          4. No pod formed
5. Flowers pink with purple veins.               5. Flowers with purplish
petals.
6. Petals barely 3 cm long.                        6. Petals 5-8 cm long.



-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>wrote:

> Radha ji,
> Thanks for your feedback.
> Hoping to find the correct id soon.
> Regards,
> Aarti
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:51 AM, radha veach <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I agree the flower looks like B. x blakeana, but I have never seen leaves
>> like those in the pictures on that species.  That pinkish tinge and the way
>> the new leaves are folded is not seen in B x blakeana. That tree's new
>> foliage is always a lightish green. Veins also look more prominent in your
>> pics. IT is not easy to make a definite judgement based only on these
>> images.
>>
>> best regards
>> Radha
>>
>>
>> On 22 December 2012 19:56, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Dinesh ji for the id and additional information.
>>> I too think this should be Bauhinia blakeana.
>>> So I suppose the name plate at Lalbagh is wrong.
>>> There are some others too with wrong id, which need to be corrected in
>>> Lalbagh, Bangalore.
>>> Regards,
>>> Aarti
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> ... to me this flower looks very much like the Hong Kong orchid, *Bauhinia
>>>> blakeana*.
>>>>
>>>> Have not yet seen *Bauhinia monandra* - the name suggests Bauhinia
>>>> bearing one stamen ... though not sure monandra in this context implies one
>>>> fertile and some infertile.
>>>>
>>>> ... photos at:
>>>> http://www.virboga.de/Bauhinia_monandra.htm
>>>>
>>>> http://www.somemagneticislandplants.com.au/index.php/plants/449-bauhinia-monandra...
>>>>  good description here.
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>> Dinesh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Aarti S. Khale 
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Resurfacing my post as the tree under discussion seems to be the same.
>>>>> Kindly confirm id.
>>>>> Mahadeswara ji has already confirmed the name plate to be correct.
>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Pictures taken in Lalbagh,Bangalore on 24/7/12.
>>>>> Flower dark purple in color.
>>>>> Sorry for the bad quality pictures due to cloudy weather.
>>>>> Kindly validate.
>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>  --
>
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to