Aarti ji
If the tree really bears mature pods, it can't be B. x blakeana, which
being a hybrid does not set seeds/pods,
   One has to check the number of fertile stamens and leaf size to confirm.

-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/


On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>wrote:

> Gurcharan ji,
> Thanks a lot for the distinguishing features between the two.
> Both the set of pictures posted by Raman ji are of the same tree
> photographed by me.
> This is near the palms, a small tree with two main trunks.
> Leaves are definitely not small, but large.
> Flowers very dark with purple petals.
> Only confusing factor is the pods. Although I haven't seen any, Raman ji's
> photographs have pod formation.
> You can see the pinkish tinge on the new leaves.
> Even Ranjini ji has posted the same flower earlier.
> Although the flowering season was over when I took the pictures, the
> single dark flower caught my attention. Had not come across a Bauhinia so
> dark pink, almost purple.
> Regards,
> Aarti
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I think there should be little difficulty in getting correct identity if
>> Aarti ji remembers major aspects of the plant. Leaves are very small in B.
>> krugii
>>
>> Bauhinia monandra (syn: B. krugii)              Bauhinia x blakeana
>> 1. Leaves 2.5-4 cm long.                            1.  Leaves 9-13 cm
>> long
>> 2. Flowers in a short raceme.                     2. Flowers in a large
>> panicle
>> 3. Fertile stamen 1.                                   3. Fertile stamens
>> 5, 3 longer.
>> 4. Pod formed.                                          4. No pod formed
>> 5. Flowers pink with purple veins.               5. Flowers with purplish
>> petals.
>> 6. Petals barely 3 cm long.                        6. Petals 5-8 cm long.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>> Retired  Associate Professor
>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Radha ji,
>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>> Hoping to find the correct id soon.
>>> Regards,
>>> Aarti
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:51 AM, radha veach <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I agree the flower looks like B. x blakeana, but I have never seen
>>>> leaves like those in the pictures on that species.  That pinkish tinge and
>>>> the way the new leaves are folded is not seen in B x blakeana. That tree's
>>>> new foliage is always a lightish green. Veins also look more prominent in
>>>> your pics. IT is not easy to make a definite judgement based only on these
>>>> images.
>>>>
>>>> best regards
>>>> Radha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22 December 2012 19:56, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Dinesh ji for the id and additional information.
>>>>> I too think this should be Bauhinia blakeana.
>>>>> So I suppose the name plate at Lalbagh is wrong.
>>>>> There are some others too with wrong id, which need to be corrected in
>>>>> Lalbagh, Bangalore.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Dinesh Valke 
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... to me this flower looks very much like the Hong Kong orchid, 
>>>>>> *Bauhinia
>>>>>> blakeana*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have not yet seen *Bauhinia monandra* - the name suggests Bauhinia
>>>>>> bearing one stamen ... though not sure monandra in this context implies 
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> fertile and some infertile.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... photos at:
>>>>>> http://www.virboga.de/Bauhinia_monandra.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.somemagneticislandplants.com.au/index.php/plants/449-bauhinia-monandra...
>>>>>>  good description here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>> Dinesh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Aarti S. Khale <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Resurfacing my post as the tree under discussion seems to be the
>>>>>>> same.
>>>>>>> Kindly confirm id.
>>>>>>> Mahadeswara ji has already confirmed the name plate to be correct.
>>>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pictures taken in Lalbagh,Bangalore on 24/7/12.
>>>>>>> Flower dark purple in color.
>>>>>>> Sorry for the bad quality pictures due to cloudy weather.
>>>>>>> Kindly validate.
>>>>>>> Aarti
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 



Reply via email to