If this tree is same as one uploaded by Raman ji, then perhaps comments in
the other thread have to be kept in mind.


-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>wrote:

> Gurcharan ji,
> Thanks for the id.
> I appreciate your efforts and time taken out in identifying this
> Bauhinia species from Lalbagh.
> Regards,
> Aarti
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I too think the tree label is wrong as 3 long and 2 short stamens are
> > clearly seen. All features point to B. x blakeana, but I think the pod
> shown
> > by Raman ji in another thread needs to be closely checked. The pod does
> not
> > look like any of the two parental species or  other species of Bauhinia.
> It
> > may well belong to another tree, or perhaps a climber.
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> > Retired  Associate Professor
> > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> > Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> > http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't think it is B.monandra as B. monandra clearly has only one big
> >> single visible stamen. Others may be small or rudimentary. Here I can
> see
> >> many and all appear equal in size.
> >>
> >> Dr Satish Phadke
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Aarti ji
> >>> If the tree really bears mature pods, it can't be B. x blakeana, which
> >>> being a hybrid does not set seeds/pods,
> >>>    One has to check the number of fertile stamens and leaf size to
> >>> confirm.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> >>> Retired  Associate Professor
> >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> >>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> >>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> >>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Gurcharan ji,
> >>>> Thanks a lot for the distinguishing features between the two.
> >>>> Both the set of pictures posted by Raman ji are of the same tree
> >>>> photographed by me.
> >>>> This is near the palms, a small tree with two main trunks.
> >>>> Leaves are definitely not small, but large.
> >>>> Flowers very dark with purple petals.
> >>>> Only confusing factor is the pods. Although I haven't seen any, Raman
> >>>> ji's photographs have pod formation.
> >>>> You can see the pinkish tinge on the new leaves.
> >>>> Even Ranjini ji has posted the same flower earlier.
> >>>> Although the flowering season was over when I took the pictures, the
> >>>> single dark flower caught my attention. Had not come across a
> Bauhinia so
> >>>> dark pink, almost purple.
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Aarti
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think there should be little difficulty in getting correct identity
> >>>>> if Aarti ji remembers major aspects of the plant. Leaves are very
> small in
> >>>>> B. krugii
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bauhinia monandra (syn: B. krugii)              Bauhinia x blakeana
> >>>>> 1. Leaves 2.5-4 cm long.                            1.  Leaves 9-13
> cm
> >>>>> long
> >>>>> 2. Flowers in a short raceme.                     2. Flowers in a
> large
> >>>>> panicle
> >>>>> 3. Fertile stamen 1.                                   3. Fertile
> >>>>> stamens 5, 3 longer.
> >>>>> 4. Pod formed.                                          4. No pod
> >>>>> formed
> >>>>> 5. Flowers pink with purple veins.               5. Flowers with
> >>>>> purplish petals.
> >>>>> 6. Petals barely 3 cm long.                        6. Petals 5-8 cm
> >>>>> long.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> >>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
> >>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> >>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> >>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> >>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> >>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Aarti S. Khale <
> [email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Radha ji,
> >>>>>> Thanks for your feedback.
> >>>>>> Hoping to find the correct id soon.
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Aarti
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:51 AM, radha veach <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>> I agree the flower looks like B. x blakeana, but I have never seen
> >>>>>>> leaves like those in the pictures on that species.  That pinkish
> tinge and
> >>>>>>> the way the new leaves are folded is not seen in B x blakeana.
> That tree's
> >>>>>>> new foliage is always a lightish green. Veins also look more
> prominent in
> >>>>>>> your pics. IT is not easy to make a definite judgement based only
> on these
> >>>>>>> images.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> best regards
> >>>>>>> Radha
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 22 December 2012 19:56, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks Dinesh ji for the id and additional information.
> >>>>>>>> I too think this should be Bauhinia blakeana.
> >>>>>>>> So I suppose the name plate at Lalbagh is wrong.
> >>>>>>>> There are some others too with wrong id, which need to be
> corrected
> >>>>>>>> in Lalbagh, Bangalore.
> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Aarti
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Dinesh Valke
> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ... to me this flower looks very much like the Hong Kong orchid,
> >>>>>>>>> Bauhinia blakeana.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Have not yet seen Bauhinia monandra - the name suggests Bauhinia
> >>>>>>>>> bearing one stamen ... though not sure monandra in this context
> implies one
> >>>>>>>>> fertile and some infertile.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ... photos at:
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.virboga.de/Bauhinia_monandra.htm
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> http://www.somemagneticislandplants.com.au/index.php/plants/449-bauhinia-monandra
> >>>>>>>>> ... good description here.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards.
> >>>>>>>>> Dinesh
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Aarti S. Khale
> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Resurfacing my post as the tree under discussion seems to be the
> >>>>>>>>>> same.
> >>>>>>>>>> Kindly confirm id.
> >>>>>>>>>> Mahadeswara ji has already confirmed the name plate to be
> correct.
> >>>>>>>>>> Aarti
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Pictures taken in Lalbagh,Bangalore on 24/7/12.
> >>>>>>>>>> Flower dark purple in color.
> >>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the bad quality pictures due to cloudy weather.
> >>>>>>>>>> Kindly validate.
> >>>>>>>>>> Aarti
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

-- 



Reply via email to