On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Mahesh T. Pai <paiva...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> 1. Look into how and why ba is defined in the standards. If it is > defined In the standards such that it hs not to form a conjunct or > take a half form, you obviously require a new code point. > > If you are looking at Bengali equivalent of Devanagari / Hindi > +U0935, you are probably having a bug in the standards. (see below) I believe this is something Runa has clarified earlier. So, the statement "bug in the standards" is a bit far-reaching given that the evidence provided by Swarup would be required to be presented to the UTC via the usual means (read: TDIL etc) > Solution - approach the UTC asking for a new code point. Yes. There have been precedents about this and, it has going through the in...@unicode.org lists. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ IndLinux-group mailing list IndLinux-group@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/indlinux-group
