Sent from my iPhone

On 31 Jul 2013, at 17:01, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@infinispan.org> wrote:

> On 31 July 2013 16:01, Mircea Markus <mmar...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On 30 Jul 2013, at 23:12, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@infinispan.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> My experience with transactions is limited, so I likely am missing on
>>> some base concept, but I don't understand why the fact that it's
>>> running on a different process is limiting in any form. We do that
>>> regularly from appservers, queues, RDBMS's, ... ?
>> 
>> It's limiting in the sense that we would have to build an XAResource bridge 
>> on the node where the tx manager runs that delegates/bridges xa instructions 
>> received from the transaction manager as RPCs to the xa cache store residing 
>> on the remote node(s). This is a rather complicated approach and might 
>> involve all the bridging RPCs to be sent in sequence which would hurt the 
>> performance drastically.
>> I think it's much nicer experience for the user to interact with ISPN as 
>> whole as an XAResource instead of Infinispan exposing the fact that its 
>> store might be XA as well.
> 
> +1
> Bottomline it's not impossible right?

It is not :-)

> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to