We're in the middle of a network redesign, and I'm reconsidering the
deployment of our AFS servers. I've always assumed that server/client
traffic exceeded server/server traffic such that it makes more sense to
distribute servers in a single cell topologically closer to clients (i.e.
scatter the servers across subnets) than it would to cluster the servers on
a single (separate?) subnet - is there any evidence that this is _not_ so,
for the common case?
Are there any "best practices" papers on network topolgy?
Thanks
Pat Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
