Thanks for the "It works here" notes. I've passed along the info to our
local gnu toolsmiths.
-kaf
> From xenon.stanford.edu!schwim Fri Dec 29 00:40:13 1995
> From: Larry Schwimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Posted-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:39:54 -0800 (PST)
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: AFS-aware RCS binaries or sources?
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith Farrar)
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:39:53 -0800
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from "Keith Farrar" at
>Dec 28, 95 05:31:36 pm
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> You (Keith Farrar) write:
> >Even an "It works just fine for me"
> >would be helpful.
>
> It works just fine for me and everyone else I know. (-:
> I currently use straight rcs5.7 from prep, emacs19.30 version
> control, and seven platforms (SunOS, Solaris, HPUX, IRIX, AIX, OSF/1,
> Ultrix).
> cvs1.6 works okay too, from what I can tell. (1.6 is the
> first version of cvs I've seen that passes "make check" on HPUX.
> 1.5 and higher are happy on the other platforms.)
>
> Yours,
> Larry Schwimmer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From glue.umd.edu!rsw Fri Dec 29 09:27:03 1995
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 09:26:41 -0800
> From: "Randall S. Winchester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Keith Farrar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: AFS-aware RCS binaries or sources?
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Keith, it works for me, but this is what we do. I do not use the AFS rcs
> stuff as it is old and out of date. I use rcs-5.6.0.1 with the gnu diff
> on a number of platforms that were last compiled as shown;
> . .build.sgi_52 README
> .. .build.sun4_413 build
> .build.alpha_osf1 .build.sun4_53 man
> .build.alpha_osf1v2 .build.sun4c_413 rcs.ms
> .build.common .build.sun4c_53 rcs.ps
> .build.common1.3 .build.sun4m_413 rcs_func.ms
> .build.hp700_ux90 .build.sun4m_53 src
> .build.pmax_ul44 COPYING
> .build.rs_aix32 Makefile
>
> Now I also keep my users AFSID == userid, so that the permissions and
> file ownerships are correct. I use rcs for just about everything here,
> including keep staff from stepping on each others work. I have not seen
> any problems with this setup.
>
> Randall
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Dec 1995, Keith Farrar wrote:
>
> >
> > > > Where would I obtain source patches (or multiple-platform binaries) for
> > > > RCS versions 5.6.0.1 or 5.7 ?
> > >
> > > Is there a particular reason you chose to ask this of the AFS mailing list?
> >
> > We are migrating several hundred megabytes to AFS this coming year.
> > Many of the files we will move are under RCS control. We have
> > had permissions problems checking in files which are updated by
> > multiple users. There is allegedly a set of TransArc-supplied RCS
> > binaries which work correctly under AFS for SunOS 4.1.X, but
> > I also need binaries for Solaris 2.X, Linux, and Irix 5.x.
> >
> > Looking through the strings output, the TransArc RCS binaries
> > we have appear to be built on RCS version 2.2 or 2.3 sources.
> >
> > I was hoping someone on this list had encountered and resolved
> > this problem.
> >
> > Even an "It works just fine for me" with an accompanying RTFM pointer
> > would be helpful.
> >
> > -kaf
> >
> > | Keith Farrar | Xerox PARC CSNS | Palo Alto, CA | 415-812-4292 |
> > | DOMAIN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AOL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> >
> >
>
| Keith Farrar | Xerox PARC CSNS | Palo Alto, CA | 415-812-4292 |
| DOMAIN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AOL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
