... an interesting discussion. >The truly hard part is not really a technical issue at all. Those of >us who know enough to do a free client wouldn't be able to, because most >of us have AFS source access, which would make it hard to claim that >the new client had been written without reading and/or using Transarc's >code... right. However what if someone knowledgeable were to simply document the protocols and interfaces and then someone at another site were to write new code from that document? Would the result still be considered tainted? -Mitch
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 and 2.0.12 peter honeyman
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 and 2.... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 an... schemers
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-... Derrick J. Brashear
- mowing Lyle_Seaman
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 and 2.... Derrick J. Brashear
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 and 2.... Derrick J. Brashear
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 and 2.... peter honeyman
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 an... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: building a free AFS client Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: building a free AFS client Garrett D'Amore
- Re: building a free AFS client Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: building a free AFS client Derrick J. Brashear
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 and 2.... Jared Mauch
- Re: Two new Linux-AFS releases... 2.0.11-2 an... Marcus Watts
