On Wed, 18 Sep 1996 17:45:25 -0400 (EDT) "Brian W. Spolarich" wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > > Yes. I've defined a rule that says that all members of groups named > > "release:<volumename>" can release <volumename>. I also allow the group > > "release" (or its members, really) to release *any* volume. I can > > forward the scheme code to this if you like. > > > > There are some drawbacks to this approach. Namely it requires giving one > > access to release any volume in the cell, or creating a separate group for > > each volume. Since you can't have nested groups, this is administratively > > inconvenient. This is one of the main reasons why I wish to rewrite this > > system. To support more flexibility configurable database is really needed
- AFS administration "wrapper" Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" Marcus Watts
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" Michael Fagan
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" Derrick J. Brashear
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper"... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper&... Garrett D'Amore
- Re: AFS administration "wra... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: AFS administration "... Garrett D'Amore
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" Truong, Phi H
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper"... Marcus Watts
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper"... Garrett D'Amore
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" Garrett D'Amore
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" schemers
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper"... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper&... Aaron Shtromas
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" Chris Cowan
- Re: AFS administration "wrapper" Steve Hanson
