Noel Yap wrote:

>
>The documentation is dead wrong.  Instead of complicating the 
documentation (by
>describing that "cvs unedit" will revert the file back to the copy at 
the time
>of "cvs edit"), it's much easier to simplify both the documentation 
and the code
>(by saying that "cvs unedit" doesn't unmodify code).
>

If it doesn't "unmodify" code, what is its purpose, then?

-- 
Stephen Rasku                   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Engineer        Web:    http://www.tgivan.com/
TGI Technologies                        http://www.pop-star.net/

Reply via email to