>[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.07.20 12:25:36
>>Noel Yap wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>The documentation is dead wrong.  Instead of complicating the
>>documentation (by
>>>describing that "cvs unedit" will revert the file back to the copy 
at
>>the time
>>>of "cvs edit"), it's much easier to simplify both the documentation
>>and the code
>>>(by saying that "cvs unedit" doesn't unmodify code).
>>>
>>
>>If it doesn't "unmodify" code, what is its purpose, then?
>
>Exactly what the command is, "cvs unedit".  It removes the edit from 
the file
>and notifies watchers of the action.  I forget how I had it treat the 
write bit
>(in my patch).
>
>Remember, "cvs edit" and family are there to facilitate communication
>among developers.  Nothing else.
>

So, what happens when you try and commit that module.  Will it commit 
that file or not?

-- 
Stephen Rasku                   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Engineer        Web:    http://www.tgivan.com/
TGI Technologies                        http://www.pop-star.net/

Reply via email to