[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.07.20 12:25:36
>Noel Yap wrote:
>
>>
>>The documentation is dead wrong. Instead of complicating the
>documentation (by
>>describing that "cvs unedit" will revert the file back to the copy at
>the time
>>of "cvs edit"), it's much easier to simplify both the documentation
>and the code
>>(by saying that "cvs unedit" doesn't unmodify code).
>>
>
>If it doesn't "unmodify" code, what is its purpose, then?
Exactly what the command is, "cvs unedit". It removes the edit from the file
and notifies watchers of the action. I forget how I had it treat the write bit
(in my patch).
Remember, "cvs edit" and family are there to facilitate communication
among developers. Nothing else.
Noel
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.
