On 14 Feb 00, at 16:01, Jerry Nairn wrote:
>
>> From: Mike Little [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 3:24 PM
>
>> But on to CVS...
>>
>> First, my (revision control related) credentials:
>
>First, I'm unimpressed. I've been at this longer than you have. But an
>appeal to superior experience or authority is simply a sign that you don't
>have any more logical arguments to support your point. It is little better
>than insulting the person you are debating.
You misunderstood me. I was not seeking to impress, I was trying to
show that I have had experience of several different types of revision
control systems. In fact two each of the concurrency and locking flavour.
I wanted to show that I had practical experience of 'both sides'.
I apologize for making you think less of me.
>Second, your experience is not part of the background for CVS. Most of your
>points on CVS are well put.
Thankyou.
Mike
--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Mike Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web: http://www.ampersoft.co.uk
PGP public key at http://www.ampersoft.co.uk/mike/mike.html
