Hi Noel,
>Again, if someone has "cvs edit -c"'d a file that I want to "cvs edit -c"
>and
>I'm told about it, what's the problem? Are you worried about those that'll
>"cvs
>edit -f" whenever they feel like it? Maybe those that habitually do this
>to
>non-mergeable files should be fired.
I simply think that the strick locks might find it's place after all these
years... Lets think what to do with 'cvs admin -l'. I still think to
completely remove it is not good, but to isolate it is a splendid one -
everybody gain - concurent and locking models will be much themselfes...
And, concurent would finally be on top! Then your "cvs edit -c" would come
to serve for real!
BR,
Jerzy
The first thing they don't teach you at school: "Never say never".
All the issues not related to the list please send to me in private, thanks.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
