"Win32 M$" wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> OK, what if we remove the locks completely? Any objections? If I am the only
> one who thinks that feature should be under control, I will step out and
> give a way to an option of completely removing the locks. I will do it

If you mean remove "cvs admin -l", sure.  I would be perfectly happy
to see that one gone.  If you mean to remove "cvs edit" and "cvs
watch", I object.  That's useful.

(Am I the only person here who thinks that (a) CVS should support
locks when necessary, and (b) it does already, for all practical
- if not all ideological - purposes?)
 
-- 
David H. Thornley                          Software Engineer
at CES International, Inc.:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] or (612)-694-2556
at home: (612)-623-0552 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
http://www.visi.com/~thornley/david/

Reply via email to