[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/16/2000 11:00:21 AM
>If you mean remove "cvs admin -l", sure. I would be perfectly happy
>to see that one gone. If you mean to remove "cvs edit" and "cvs
>watch", I object. That's useful.
Yeah, don't remove "cvs edit" and "cvs watch".
>(Am I the only person here who thinks that (a) CVS should support
>locks when necessary, and (b) it does already, for all practical
>- if not all ideological - purposes?)
I'm in this camp, too. I'm also trying to improve the edit-style "locks" by
creating a "cvs ci -c" patch. Of course, I'll be sure to let everyone know when
this is ready.
Noel
