Mitch Davis writes: > > ObCVS: Someone recently said that CVS would sleep until the > clock had ticked to the next second. Why is this sleep > necessary? What operations would it speed up if it were > not necessary to do this sleep? The sleep is necessary to ensure that any modification of a file will result in a change to its timestamp. It only happens when a cvs command that set file timestamps is finished, and it only sleeps until one second has passed since the last timestamp, so it doesn't have a significant impact (and it may not even sleep at all). -Larry Jones Buddy, if you think I'm even going to BE here, you're crazy! -- Calvin
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Mitch Davis
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... Michael Gersten
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Tobias Weingartner
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Tobias Weingartner
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Brian Huddleston
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Brian Huddleston
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Michael Gersten
- Re: [offtopic] Could timestam... Mitch Davis
- Re: Could timestamps be repla... Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... John Macdonald
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Tobias Weingartner
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Ken Raeburn
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Ken Raeburn
- Re: Could timestamps be repla... Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Michael Gersten
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... Mitch Davis
- RE: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Leeuw, Guus (G.)
