Ken Raeburn writes [quoting me quoting him]: > > > > Should CVS > > > insert a delay in its operation after updating a file (or set of > > > files), to make sure the timestamp on the file and in CVS/Entries is > > > no longer "current" before the user gets control back? > > > > It already does. > > So it does. But is it verifying the file contents too? No. -Larry Jones Why is it you always rip your pants on the day everyone has to demonstrate a math problem at the chalkboard? -- Calvin
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Brian Huddleston
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Michael Gersten
- Re: [offtopic] Could timestam... Mitch Davis
- Re: [offtopic] Could timestam... Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... John Macdonald
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Tobias Weingartner
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Ken Raeburn
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced ... Ken Raeburn
- Re: Could timestamps be repla... Larry Jones
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Michael Gersten
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with ... Mitch Davis
- RE: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Leeuw, Guus (G.)
- RE: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Leeuw, Guus (G.)
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Win32 M$
- RE: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Leeuw, Guus (G.)
- RE: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Leeuw, Guus (G.)
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Noel L Yap
- Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Donald Sharp
- Could timestamps be replaced with MD5? Lenny Foner
