Re: Could timestamps be replaced with MD5?

[Ken Raeburn]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) writes:

> > Should CVS
> > insert a delay in its operation after updating a file (or set of
> > files), to make sure the timestamp on the file and in CVS/Entries is
> > no longer "current" before the user gets control back?
> 
> It already does.

So it does.  But is it verifying the file contents too?