> From: Greg Noel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 10:45 AM
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2000 10:09:09 +0200 Guus Leeuw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Or even, your build system, detecting A is not there, but
> needed, checks
> >it out.
>
> Actually, the reverse is true. If the build system detects
> that the submodule
> has been checked out, it automatically enables the code that uses it.
The reverse? Hmmmm....
So it's up to the developer building M for A, B, or C?
In that case, you cannot do more then
1) Ask at the beginning of the build, what subs to include, if none have
been detected (if this is a valid rule :)
2) Move the subs (A, B, C) when they are detected to the correct place
and build away.
Anyone other views?
Guus
