While this is a twisted idea (I mean that in a good way ;) there may be some other good that could come from such an effort: Consider: if you seperate the interface from the actual storage, you could in theory enable: 1) storing the data as a compressed image. This would help reduce the growth rate of the repository. 2) Storing the data in some form of database. This could allow the addition of atomic commits and other A.C.I.D. operations. 3) Making the backend of CVS into a kernel module (ducks and dons flamesuit laughing maniacally ^). _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with Cle... Julian Gosnell
- RE: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Chris Cameron
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS bac... Julian Gosnell
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS... Donald Sharp
- Re: Crazy idea - replace... Julian Gosnell
- Re: Crazy idea - re... Donald Sharp
- RE: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Weber, Mathias-Henry 1254 PPW-P1
- RE: Crazy idea - replace RCS bac... Julian Gosnell
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Noel L Yap
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... David D. Hagood
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Noel L Yap
- RE: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Harkins, Jim
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... James Melton
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Eric Siegerman
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Julian Gosnell
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Mike Castle
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Paul Sander
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Paul Sander
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Julian Gosnell
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend... Paul Sander
