On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:12:21AM -0500, David D. Hagood wrote:
> While this is a twisted idea (I mean that in a good way ;) there may be 
> some other good that could come from such an effort:
> 
> Consider: if you seperate the interface from the actual storage, you 
> could in theory enable:
> 
> 1) storing the data as a compressed image. This would help reduce the 
> growth rate of the repository.
> 2) Storing the data in some form of database. This could allow the 
> addition of atomic commits and other A.C.I.D. operations.
> 3) Making the backend of CVS into a kernel module (ducks and dons 
> flamesuit laughing maniacally ^).

4) Storing each version of a binary file discretely, as recently
   discussed in another thread.

--

|  | /\
|-_|/  >   Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  |  /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
        - RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)

_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

Reply via email to