Hadn't really considered triggers.
I figure they should still fire - after all they were
put there to keep the vob consistent - that is not a
constraint that suddenly disappears because I access
it through a different interface... - is it ? How are
you using triggers that would not map to this ?
Re your other mail about CC's fnality being a superset
of CVS'. It doesn't worry me. I simply want CVS based
tools to work. If you need the extra fnality, you
simply step outside CVS and talk in CC instead.
Fortunately I know people at Cisco - I shall give them
a bell.
Thanks for the pointer,
Jules
--- Paul Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do
you plan to support trigger behavior?
> Whatever ClearCase triggers
> you already have installed will continue to fire
> within the CVS framework.
> This may or may not be appropriate.
>
> --- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > But you will loose a lot of the power of Clearcase
> > by this.
> > Is it ok to loose the flexibility that CC gives
> you?
> >
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Imagine you have got a tool that only talks CVS.
>
> You will be able to use it on top of a CC vob and
> everything would work as usual.
>
> You will not miss any CC functionality, because the
> tool wouldn't know what to do with it anyway. It
> will
> only have menu options for CVS commands.
>
> If you want CC fnality, drop out to a command line
> and
> use it there.
>
> --- End of forwarded message from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
