On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:47:57PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Tuesday, September 25, 2001 at 21:08:59 (+0400), Tobias Brox wrote: ]
> > Subject: File permissions
> >
> > saving, and later restoring simple file permissions and ownership really
> > shouldn't be that hard, and I'd daresay it can be a nice feature,
> > particularly when storing configuration files in cvs.
>
> There's no way to handle _any_ file attribute change tracking without
> extending the RCS file format. Period.
And the RCS file format is explicitly extensible. Read
rcsfile(5); look for "newphrase".
Kaz Kylheku recently took up my challenge to give *valid* reasons
not to track file metadata:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/info-cvs/2001-September/019853.html
I'm semi-convinced :-)
But this:
> Take it up with the RCS maintainers if you want to do something
> productive about it.
is horsefeathers.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
The world has been attacked. The world must respond ... [but] we must
be guided by a commitment to do what works in the long run, not by what
makes us feel better in the short run.
- Jean Chr�tien, Prime Minister of Canada
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
