We've been using CVS with the repository exported via NFS to our UNIX boxen. now we need to connect to another cvs repo at a remote site and the only access the want to give us is via wincvs with the repository on a mapped drive.
Now, just from discussion on this list I realise this is bad. My question is what are the potential issues with this approach? I need a better answer than "I've heard it's bad" to try and cut through the fog of developer inertia and blinding stupidity we've got here, not that It'll help. Could someone explain to me the issues with mounting the repo via a network filesystem? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Navarre It was a hard sell, since he's a database person, and as far as I've seen, once those database worms eat into your brain, it's hard to ever get anything practical done again. To a database person, every nail looks like a thumb. Or something like that. - jwz _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
