At 08:01 PM 9/17/2002, Adam Bregenzer wrote: >AFIAK the issue is not with where the working copy is stored, as long as >you are the only one accessing the working copy. The issue is where the >repository is stored/accessed from.
That's correct. I misunderstood the original question and thought it had to do with how the repository was accessed. Letting CVS touch a repository mounted on a network filesystem is a bad idea. Using client-server CVS where the server accesses the repository through a local interface is the recommended method. The diagram by Alan Dayley shows the recommended method. Where you put your sandbox is a different matter. For performance reasons (I/O throughput during compiles and network traffic) you might want to put it on a local disk. Policy makers don't always understand performance issues, though. Fred _______________________________________________________________ Frederic W. Brehm, Sarnoff Corporation, http://www.sarnoff.com/ _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
