On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:23:48AM -0700, Mike Ayers wrote: > It also helps to point out that there should be no need to backup the > sandbox directories.
Well, I wouldn't go that far, for precisely the reasons you describe: > This, however, requires that the developers be > trained to perform intermediary checkins of work in progress, which > itself requires training in branch-and-merge development for larger > changes (or just to permit checking in still broken files), so it's > not the simplest thing. I'd rephrase "there should be no need" to "depending on your process, you might be able to get away without it". -- | | /\ |-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | / The acronym for "the powers that be" differs in only one letter from that for "the pointy-haired boss". _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
