Matthew Herrmann writes: > > The only caveat to this approach is that "cvs tag" should not be used, only > "cvs rtag" since you risk polluting your utils project with TAGS from > multiple projects otherwise. This caveat is not a drawback for me since I > consider "cvs tag" a dangerous option.
Why? It's "cvs rtag" when used without the -r option that's truely dangerous, since you have no way of knowing what revisions you're tagging. -Larry Jones Even if lives DID hang in the balance, it would depend on whose they were. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
