If 'cvs tag' is run from a subdirectory of within a large directory structure, only files within that section will be given the tag -- that subdirectory is treated like a module. No error appears because this operation is valid. Later, when trying to diff between versions of the software, lots of spurious changes will come up due to the incorrect tagging. With "cvs rtag", the user is forced to tag every file in the entire repository.
I always understood that "cvs rtag" without a "-r" would tag the latest version of all files on the trunk, synonymous with "cvs rtag -rHEAD tagname module" (?) I had been using it in this manner for some time and not experienced behaviour to contradict this. Matthew Herrmann -------------------------------------- VB6/SQL/Java/CVS Consultancy Far Edge Technology http://www.faredge.com.au/ -----Original Message----- From: Larry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 6 July 2003 09:43 To: Matthew Herrmann Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Info-cvs Digest, Vol 8, Issue 6 Matthew Herrmann writes: > > The only caveat to this approach is that "cvs tag" should not be used, only > "cvs rtag" since you risk polluting your utils project with TAGS from > multiple projects otherwise. This caveat is not a drawback for me since I > consider "cvs tag" a dangerous option. Why? It's "cvs rtag" when used without the -r option that's truely dangerous, since you have no way of knowing what revisions you're tagging. -Larry Jones Even if lives DID hang in the balance, it would depend on whose they were. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
