> -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... > Why? It's "cvs rtag" when used without the -r option that's truely > dangerous, since you have no way of knowing what revisions you're > tagging.
Matthew Herrmann wrote: > I always understood that "cvs rtag" without a "-r" would tag the latest > version of all files on the trunk, synonymous with "cvs rtag -rHEAD tagname > module" (?) I had been using it in this manner for some time and not > experienced behaviour to contradict this. Yes, but what if someone commits something between when you decide to run the rtag and when you actually run it? That is the danger. Max. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
