"A picture paints a thousand words" (David Gates of Bread) Because of my CVS experience, AND the help from you folks, I understand now WHY CVS does its branching. But I have to explain this to my users, and some of them are a lot less experienced than I am with the tool. So when they're looking at a GUI tool like tkCVS and don't see "physially" see that branchY does branch from branchX like I told them it does, it's hard for me to explain say "Well it does!" Some of these folks are from Missouri so they say "Show me!" and a picture would be the perfect answer to this, regardless of version numbers.
-chris -----Original Message----- From: Larry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:57 PM To: Fouts Christopher () Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branch head???) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > It's just when I branch I want to see the "physical" branch, > regardless where it's coming from. Why? The process you describe will work just fine with CVS. In fact, it's a fairly popular process. Just ignore the actual revision numbers (which you should be doing anyway) and everything will be fine. -Larry Jones Wheeee. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
