This picture that you drew for me! :)
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
| 1.1 |----| 1.2 |----| 1.3 |---- ...
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
|
branch_a
|
branch_b
tkCVS essentially shows this picture (also drawn by you).
branch_a
|
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
| 1.1 |----| 1.2 |----| 1.3 |---- ...
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
|
branch_b
Even though they're equivalent (I understand!) the first picture
will sum up the "1000 words" to them.
-chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim.Hyslop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:06 AM
To: Fouts Christopher (); Jim.Hyslop; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a
branch head???)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you very much!!! Like I said, this all make perfect sense to ME
> now.
Yep, I got that part. I was trying to provide you with some educational
tools :-)
> the pictures below will just add confussion
> (to THEM).
> But like me, hopefully in due time they'll catch on...
I wasn't sure if they'd help. I'll see if I can think of anything
better.
Can you post a screen shot of the kind of branching they expect to see
(or
email it to me directly if you don't want to post it publicly)?
--
Jim Hyslop
Senior Software Designer
Leitch Technology International Inc. (http://www.leitch.com)
Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal (http://www.cuj.com/experts)
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
