Spammers' New Tactic Upends DNS
January 10, 2005
By  Dennis Fisher
http://www.eweek.com/print_article2/0,2533,a=142238,00.asp

Although some ISPs and legislators are crediting the year-old CAN-SPAM Act
and better technology for recent gains in the war on spam, many in the
industry say the advances are forcing spammers to employ new tactics, which
are destabilizing the Internet's crucial DNS.

One troublesome technique finding favor with spammers involves sending mass
mailings in the middle of the night from a domain that has not yet been
registered. After the mailings go out, the spammer registers the domain
early the next morning.

By doing this, spammers hope to avoid stiff CAN-SPAM fines through minimal
exposure and visibility with a given domain. The ruse, they hope, makes them
more difficult to find and prosecute.

The scheme, however, has unintended consequences of its own. During the
interval between mailing and registration, the SMTP servers on the
recipients' networks attempt Domain Name System look-ups on the nonexistent
domain, causing delays and timeouts on the DNS servers and backups in SMTP
message queues.

"Anti-spam systems have become heavily dependent on DNS for looking at all
kinds of blacklists, looking at headers, all of that," said Paul Judge, a
well-known anti-spam expert and chief technology officer at CipherTrust
Inc., a mail security vendor based in Atlanta. "I've seen systems that have
to do as many as 30 DNS calls on each message. Even in large enterprises,
it's becoming very common to see a large spam load cripple the DNS
infrastructure."

Click here to read Larry Seltzer's Jan. 5 column on the spam war.

The DNS handles address look-ups for all Web sites on the Internet,
translating natural language names into IP addresses. But its first use was
as a look-up service for mail records, and it continues to be used for the
billions of e-mail messages traversing the Internet daily.

The CAN-SPAM Act, which went into effect at the beginning of last year, was
designed to reduce spam by making it illegal to send messages with spoofed
addresses. One spammer already has been sentenced to jail for violating the
law, and America Online Inc. said recently that the threat of prosecution,
along with better filtering, has helped reduce spam complaints by 75
percent.

In reality, experts say, spammers shut down DNS access to domains that they
control after as few as 12 hours to prevent ISPs or law enforcement
officials from tracking them down. This tactic also wreaks havoc with the
DNS as mail servers trying to return undeliverable messages will continue to
perform DNS queries on the defunct domain.

"We've had to reset our architecture to make nine DNS look-ups, which is an
insane amount. And we've bought a bunch of workstations and small servers to
use as redundant DNS servers because of the load," said Bill Franklin,
president of Zero Spam Network Corp., an anti-spam hosting provider based in
Coral Gables, Fla. "The DNS system is a good warning indicator."

Click here to read about the effectiveness of various anti-spam
technologies.

More troubling than the DNS problems is that there is little ISPs and
enterprises can do, other than buying more capacity and setting up redundant
DNS servers.

"We have to figure out how to taper DNS services gracefully rather than
having catastrophic failures," said Paul Mockapetris, the author of the
first DNS implementation and chief scientist at Nominum Inc., based in
Redwood City, Calif. "Mail look-up was the first application put on top of
DNS after I designed it, and I was so excited to see that. And now, 20 years
later, people are trying to figure out how to stop doing mail look-up on
DNS. It's bizarre."

Check out eWEEK.com's Messaging & Collaboration Center for more on IM and
other collaboration technologies.



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit 
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message 
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights 
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to