S&P Opens A Rating Service On Schools
Site Offers Public Comparative Data

By Jay Mathews
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 30, 2005; Page B01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A10050-2005Mar29?language=printer

With the launch of a nationwide Web site yesterday, parents in the District,
Maryland and Virginia will have access to the kind of detailed information
about their public schools that investors have long had about Fortune 500
companies.

The free Web site, SchoolMatters.com, was developed by financial data giant
Standard & Poor's and offers a searchable collection of education data,
including per-pupil spending, student performance and classroom size.

Standard & Poor's got the idea for compiling the data when it noticed that
some school districts were saying the company's bond ratings proved that
they were doing a good job in the classroom, said Abby Potts with the
Council of Chief State School Officers, one of the sponsors of the Web site.
The company began to offer the education data as a better measure of
teaching and learning. It also established firewalls between its school
evaluators and its bond raters so that they could not influence one another,
Potts said.

Early reaction from some Washington area parents suggests that the site is
giving people what they want.

"I'm always in favor of giving people more information," said Dick Reed, a
former PTA president at Fairfax County's Edison High School. "The more the
better, and this site does that well -- both by providing information that
parents, in particular, have trouble getting at all, and by providing that
hard-to-get information in an easily read and understood fashion."

But some school district administrators said some Web site numbers are
wrong, out of date or easily misinterpreted. Sharon Ackerman, assistant
superintendent for instruction in the Loudoun County schools, said staffing
trends and class size numbers for 2002 to 2003 were out of touch with
reality. One page of the Web site said some schools in Loudoun averaged 132
students in each classroom, she said.

"This site could be useful for parents as a starting point to find
information about past performance of students in specific schools,"
Ackerman said. "However, the data must be accurate."

Web site officials said the class size and other numbers came from federal
education agencies.

The Web site is run by the Education Data Partnership, a collaboration that
includes the Council of Chief State School Officers, Standard & Poor's, the
nonprofit group Achieve Inc., which manages state education standards, and
the CELT Corp., a technology company. The work is supported by grants from
the Broad Education Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The site provides test score results by race and also by economic
background. It also shows the differences in how school systems spend tax
dollars and allows residents concerned about how money is spent to see what
portion of new revenue coming into each district is spent on instruction.

The site calls this the Instructional Spending Allocation Index, which
measures the proportion of increased spending over time allocated for
instruction and provides a way to track money raised with the intent of
improving student performance. The portion of new dollars for instruction in
Washington area school districts in 2002 ranged from 104.8 percent in the
District, which Web site officials said spent all of its new money and then
some extra from other sources on school performance, to 52.6 percent in
Prince William County.

That index and other data developed by Standard & Poor's should be handled
with care, the Web site says. It includes a warning from former North
Carolina governor James B. Hunt, one of the leaders of the national school
improvement movement and a member of a Standard & Poor's advisory board,
that "these ratios should not be used alone to draw conclusions about
education performance."

Kenneth Bernstein, a teacher at Prince George's County's Eleanor Roosevelt
High School, said he thought that statement odd. "For all the warnings by
Hunt and others not to use the data for comparisons, what do they expect,
when the only really new thing they offer is precisely that data?" he asked.

Officials from Standard & Poor's School Evaluation Services said they first
tried out the data collection and presentation system in Michigan and
Pennsylvania, and some school district leaders were not happy being
identified as spending more per pupil with less impressive results than
their neighbors. But some educators said the information can help them focus
their resources where they are most needed.

"By using SchoolMatters to identify schools with successful practices,
principals can adjust instructional methods to further student achievement
and help drive overall school improvement," said Brian Glades, principal of
Fisher Elementary School in Redford, Mich.

Montgomery County parent John Hoven said the Web site was on the right
track. "It doesn't deliver what it promises, but it could easily do so," he
said.

He said the Web site recognizes that any fair comparison of schools must
account for differences in student demographics, and it shows how easily
this can be done with a simple graph called a scatterplot, which illustrates
various patterns and relationships. But the Web site does not yet include a
procedure for users to create their own scatterplots to compare school
districts or ask such questions as whether higher spending, more rigorous
standards or smaller class sizes raise student achievement.

Web site officials said that because Maryland is using new state tests, it
is more difficult to get a true sense of the improvement in its schools over
time than it is in Virginia and the District, which have been giving the
same annual tests to all students for several years.

� 2005 The Washington Post Company



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to