Beware the product death cycle
By strategy+business
http://news.com.com/Beware%20the%20product%20death%20cycle/2030-1069_3-56290
08.html
March 30, 2005, 12:00 PM PST

Back in November 1980, the Pulitzer Prize�winning historian Barbara Tuchman
asserted in The New York Times Magazine that the quality of civilization was
going downhill.

Mass production, she wrote, had rendered the devices and luxuries of the
good life--furniture, watches, clothes, toys--more plentiful than ever. But
these products were not as durable, as reliable, or as pleasing as their
handmade preindustrial counterparts.

Her article, titled "The Decline of Quality" and published as a cover story
in the magazine, was fiercely passionate. Society was filling up with junk,
and it was up to all of us to rescue it, she declared.

Tuchman probably didn't know it, but manufacturers were starting to agree
with her. Spurred by the threat of Japanese competition and suffering their
own painful loss of market share, a number of American and European
corporations adopted a set of process management ideas in the early 1980s
known generally as "total quality management," or TQM.

Incorporating in-depth statistical production analysis and some pioneering
approaches to participative management, TQM later spun off a host of popular
management concepts, including Six Sigma. Maestros of quality-oriented
management, such as W. Edwards Deming and Joseph Juran, demonstrated to
American business audiences that they could bring the spirit of elite
craftsmanship into mass production without adding cost.
After a decade of quality practice, there was an almost utopian sense in the
air.

Quality improvement might have required up-front investment, but it
ultimately reduced costs by cutting waste and eliminating rework and
repairs. By the early 1990s, after a decade of quality practice, there was
an almost utopian sense in the air that consumer goods, from toaster ovens
to high-tech computer devices, would never stop improving, and the quality
of life would get better and better.

Those were the days. For the past few years, it has appeared that U.S.
corporations are once again employing strategies that emphasize short-term
gains from the production of cheaply made, junky products. Kitchen
appliances, power tools, cell phones, computer printers, DVD players, toys
and many other consumer goods are increasingly conceived and sold as
disposable commodities. Although these products have more features and
capabilities every year, their durability and longevity are rapidly
dwindling.

As in the 1970s, this strategy poses serious dangers--from the erosion of
well-established brands to the ultimate financial failure of companies. But
it may be harder now to reverse the tide because several trends in
manufacturing and marketing subtly reinforce one another. Instead of facing
competition from high-quality Japanese manufacturers, companies in
industrialized countries face tough competition from low-wage countries and
high price-cutting pressure from global retailers.

Even when producers do promote quality, far fewer consumers seem to care. In
this environment, many companies now seem to perceive the production of
shoddy products as an effective bottom-line strategy. But giving into this
increasingly irresistible temptation can put a company's future market share
and profits at risk.

Anecdotes and evidence
Has product quality really declined that much since the early 1990s?
Admittedly, much of the evidence is anecdotal. But its sources are diverse:
repair shop technicians, blog gripes, current and former TQM consultants and
myriad acquaintances with stories of annoyance. Lamp housings crack;
videocassette recorders rewind slowly and haltingly; cell phone batteries
fall out; shirt buttons crumble; washing machines falter; televisions render
flesh tones in rainbow hues.

Overall automobile performance is better, but many vehicle components are
still maddeningly fragile. For instance, the dashboard "idiot light" on many
cars signals a mysterious computer-detected malfunction somewhere in the
engine (often in the sensors tied to the catalytic converter). It typically
requires a repair shop visit to diagnose and shut off the light. But then, a
day or two after the ostensible repair, the light reactivates itself, like a
movie monster that cannot be killed.

There also is empirical evidence of declining product quality--evidence that
Barbara Tuchman didn't have at her disposal back in 1980. Since 1994, for
example, the American Society for Quality and the University of Michigan
have cosponsored the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), based on
customer surveys. Overall, ACSI ratings of manufactured goods have basically
held steady over time, but exceptional companies (notably Dell and Apple
Computer, with satisfaction increases of 9.7 percent since 1997 and 5.2
percent since 1994, respectively) skew the results.

Other big-name companies show deterioration, including companies that have
invested millions of dollars in associating their brands with reliability
and quality: Hewlett-Packard is down 9 percent in customer satisfaction
since 1994, and several appliance manufacturers are down more than 4.5
percent. Even GE is down 2.5 percent. (A full table of this company data can
be found at ACSI's Web site.

Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports, has kept track
of product reliability through its consumer surveys of repair data. It also
tracks the frequency of product recalls, which have risen steadily since
1990. Here, the trends are suggestive but inconclusive. Senior Editor Tod
Marks, whose beat at Consumer Reports includes repair and reliability, notes
that quality in many product categories is better overall than it used to
be.

Still, many product manufacturers have lowered engineering standards to
shave their costs. "One thing that often goes wrong with a videocassette
recorder is the loading mechanism," Marks says. "That used to be metal,
attached with screws. Now it's a piece of extruded plastic fused to the
chassis."

The most solid empirical evidence on product quality involves warranty
statistics, such as the number of units returned each year to retailers (and
hence to manufacturers) for repair or replacement under warranty. The
Financial Accounting Standards Board began requiring manufacturers to
disclose this information only in early 2003, and there has never been any
systematic analysis of warranty costs as a percentage of revenues. However,
three veteran quality consultants told me that the number of warranty
returns they see, particularly in the computer and electronics industries,
is rising.

"It's happening on so many dimensions," says Greg Brue, president of
Albuquerque-based Six Sigma Consultants and author of "Design for Six
Sigma." "Companies are going to shorter and shorter warranties, and dealing
with more and more repairs, and responding with rebates and price promotions
instead of improving their products--and they feel like they're getting away
with it."

Those at the Consumers Union and ACSI argue that products aren't necessarily
getting worse. Indeed, technical conformance to standards is going up, says
ACSI Managing Director David Van Amburg. It is just that "customer
expectations are going up faster than the ability of the companies to meet
them." This doesn't fully account for either the statistics or the stories,
however. In the end, only one conclusion seems to fit: In every product
category, a few good brands continue to improve their durability and
reliability. The good get better, and the rest get worse.

Unplanned obsolescence
A consumer advocate might argue (as many did back in the 1970s) that the
culprit is planned obsolescence. Companies deliberately design shabby
products so customers will keep replacing them with new ones.

But reality is not so simple. Consumers themselves tolerate irritating
product failures and flaws far more than they used to, even when they have
more channels (such as the Internet) through which to voice complaints.
Presumably, consumers' tolerance for poor product quality and short-lived
products is higher because it costs less today to replace a broken toy,
cordless drill, or VCR. As Tod Marks of Consumer Reports observes: "In the
early 1990s, we found that if a product cost $30 or less, people wouldn't
bother to get it fixed. But as the years went by, that price point has
steadily gone up--now, it's probably at about $100."

There are other contributing factors. TQM has lost its cachet inside many
companies. Since Deming died in 1993, the number of faculty teaching quality
in business schools has dwindled, and so has student interest. Although
quality practices still have a place in many companies--and have moved
beyond the factory floor--TQM doesn't capture the attention of as many
senior executives as it once did.

Chinese manufacturers have shown that you don't have to offer quality to
compete if you can slash prices enough. "I see no evidence of the managers
and workers at these facilities having the slightest concept of quality,"
says John Dowd, an American quality expert who has visited dozens of Chinese
factories. "They will comply with customer requirements when they are
monitored closely, but left alone, it's strictly: 'Get it out the door.'"

Retailers are also culpable because of their increasingly aggressive price
bargaining. And new retail devices, like the extended warranty, also play a
role. The extended warranty first emerged in the 1980s as a high-priced form
of product insurance that allowed corporations to hedge their warranty
protection costs. The typical extended warranty, which is a contract many
retailers try to bundle with a product purchase, provides consumers with an
extra year or two of either replacement or repairs. Gradually, the extended
warranty has become a way of life for U.S. electronics and appliance
retailers; in-store and call center salespeople are often given incentive
pay for every extended warranty they sell. Stores magazine, a retail trade
journal, estimates that more than $5 billion worth of extended warranties
were sold in North America in 2002.

Consumer Reports routinely warns its readers against extended warranties; at
10 to 30 percent of a product's retail price, they're statistically more
expensive than the aggregate cost of simply replacing products when they
fail. But these warranties are popular nonetheless, presumably because of
the sense of security they provide to customers. When you have an extended
warranty, it is easier to justify buying a DVD player or telephone that you
fear might fall apart. But this sets up an almost irresistible perverse
incentive for manufacturers.

Not only is it easier for them to make goods that aren't durable,
manufacturers can now profitably "double dip." This means when they receive
a failed device, they can replace its broken parts and sell it again, not as
"preowned" or refurbished, but as new. Brue, the Six Sigma consultant, says
of one computer peripherals company that he works with, "They have more
revenue coming from processing extended warranties, refurbishing the
returned units, and sending them back out than they do in getting the
product right the first time."


To Brue, there are two categories of products that retailers sell, each with
its own pattern of deterioration--or (though he doesn't use this phrase, it
seems to fit) its own "product death cycle." Both categories are engineered
to stand up to normal wear and tear for the first year or so. But then the
death cycles begin to differ. The first group of products show return and
repair statistics that rise fairly rapidly after the warranty expiration
date. The second category has lower return and repair rates, even after the
warranty expires.

Having tracked these statistics for a range of client companies, Brue says
they correlate consistently with profitability in the long run. Companies
that produce products with lower return rates after the warranty expires
tend to have consistently stronger bottom lines over the long term than
those whose product quality erodes more rapidly. These financial results
don't show up immediately; they typically appear five years or more after
the product is introduced.

In other words, consumers stop buying products and brands they think are
likely to break down. Although many top executives may decide that product
failures and loyalty erosion aren't all that important in the larger scheme
of business, Brue says that's not a responsible fiduciary attitude. "A
product failure leaves a scar in a company's reputation," he says. "It makes
the consumer wonder: Will the company get the next one right?"

No way out
Several experts argue that the solution to our latest quality crisis will
emerge on its own from competition and innovation. Jack West, past president
of the American Society for Quality, says that even Chinese companies are
choosing to adopt Six Sigma techniques.

New technologies like radio frequency identification (RFID) chips also offer
hope. If your DVD player needs a new loading tray, the RFID chip will detect
the problem, notify the factory, and arrange delivery of the proper
replacement part, ready to snap into place.

But itis not self-evident that manufacturing companies will change as easily
as they did in the 1980s. The advancing microchip, the falling price of
products, and the global manufacturing environment may have permanently
changed attitudes about product quality and the competitive environment in
many industries.

Rather than retooling for continual upgradeability, manufacturers may simply
assume unending consumer tolerance, and slide down the slope of cost
reductions and quality erosion. Many former major brand producers will
survive as commodity makers of retail house brands, with devices engineered
for replacement every year or so. Consumers will live amid perpetually new
things, tossing the discards into landfills. Barbara Tuchman's fears will
then finally come to pass.

And who will care? Maybe only the last few managers, of the last few quality
brands, who, like monks in the Dark Ages, keep alive an ideal that others
have forgotten--and derive premium profits that nobody else understands.

To read more articles like this one, visit
http://www.strategy-business.com/.

Copyright � 2005 Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. 



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to