Original URL: 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/09/urquhart_file-share_hatch/

File-sharing Republican blogger tackles Hollywood Hatch

By Gavin Clarke in San Francisco (gavin.clarke at theregister.co.uk)
Published Friday 9th September 2005 18:04 GMT

Interview A US politician challenging the pro-Hollywood Utah Senator Orrin
Hatch is supporting file-sharing as a means to promote business innovation
and keep the internet free.

Republican challenger Steve Urquhart is taking a pro-small business and
creative commons stance against Hatch, arguing that hobbling file-sharing
technology through government legislation, that is enforced through the
courts, is bad for business. Urquhart is running for the GOP seat against
Hatch in 2006.

Urquhart has talked out against Hatch¹s proposed Induce Act, a bill that
world make ³the intentional inducement of copyright infringement² an
offense. He is also critical of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA),
backed by Hatch - and others - and signed into law.

Urquhart, whose campaign (http://www.steveu.com) seeks donations from
internet users, not just those living and voting in his native land of Utah,
believes Hatch¹s legislation plays into the hands of big, corporate media
interests and helps stifle small business.

³Senator Hatch has shown that he doesn¹t understand the internet, or at
least, he does not welcome the kind of democratizing tool it can be,²
Urquhart told The Register.

³File-sharing technology is value-neutral and it¹s amazing. The technology
should be lauded. Like most good things, though, it can be used in
inappropriate ways. In those cases, the actions, not the technology should
be discouraged,² he said.

Urquhart is sharply critical of both Hatch and the Induce Act, and the
defense they use of protecting copyright. ³I think the threat of potential
copyright suits by Hollywood and the recording industry makes it difficult
for new businesses to compete. Small businesses simply won¹t bother to enter
the fray or will fold at the first threat of a suit ­ even when what they
are doing is legal,² Urquhart said.

He noted big organizations like Disney have built massive franchises by
taking prior art from the common culture and slapping on their own
copyright, thereby claiming ownership. ³Walt Disney built an empire by
taking public domain works like Cinderella and dressing them up with his
imagination,² Urquhart said.

He believes the reason legislation like the Induce Act has become possible
is a result of the lobbying power of entrenched business and what he called:
³The lack of appreciation for how fundamentally different the economy and
business are today than they were when these [politicians] left real life
and entered the beltway."

³Politicians can best help . . . the internet community by staying out of
the way. Politicians usually are a few steps behind society. When it comes
to the internet, they are laps behind,² Urquhart said.

Urquhart is a keen blogger and is using his online campaign against Hatch to
encourage techies to flex their muscle. The candidate said he¹d attracted
³significant² support from internet users and ³many² tech backers in his
efforts to raise between $750,000 and $1m to fund the 2006 campaign against
Hatch.

He claims internet users supporting him share a common chord of wanting a
senator who understands the internet, and its role in the economy, and who
is willing to fight to protect the part it plays.

Voting out the incumbent will also send the message to lawmakers in the US
Congress about the value of file sharing and how the Induce Act, and similar
works like the defunct Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion
Act sponsored by Senator Fritz Hollings ­ a.k.a ³the Senator from Disney² -
are ill conceived.

³I¹m confident that if the technical community were to help turn out Senator
Hatch, 534 other people in Washington would pay closer attention to
technology in the future,² Urquhart said.®



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to