It's a good thing that this came up, it'd be nice to have a clear decision
from the Fedora part. I explained in detail the log & reasoning behind the
decision to stop maintaining the open-source branch in the GitHub issue
Rahul provided.

In the meantime, the Transifex team is happy to be donating one of the
bigger plans to Fedora for free (which supports sharing of teams, Transl.
Memory and glossary between teams), and we'll continue to do so.

-d


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora
> moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it
> wasn't important anymore for them to maintain a open source version.
>
> https://github.com/transifex/transifex/issues/206#issuecomment-15243207
>
> Should we consider alternatives?
>
> Rahul
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>



-- 
Dimitris Glezos
Founder & CEO, Transifex
https://www.transifex.com/
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Reply via email to