Guys, We may collect the Transifex all Coordinators, Reviewers and Translators through the API, for example:
$ curl -i -L --user username:password -X GET https://www.transifex.com/api/2/project/fedora/language/pt_BR/ Think this activity will diminish the impact of migration. Today we have the teams names entry Zanata different of wiki page ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_Teams) and too Transifex, for example, in the case of my team in Zanata this: "pt-br" and in our wiki this "pt_br" and Transifex "pt_BR", I believe our default is wiki, in my opinion. The steps for migrations( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_Move_To_Zanata) is necessary creating the group "Fedora", from what I understand in of Zanata a group should have the "Fedora", in languages would be the teams and designs belong to a group, I believe that the relationship is this, if I'm wrong please correct me. I hope the new version of Zanata (3.4.2) is faster, because for me the test platform is a little slow. Thanks, firemanxbr On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Noriko Mizumoto <nor...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi Dimitris > > I've read your thread posted in Infra. > Indeed, it is sad to hear but understand your position. > It was just like yesterday, we moved from elvis to transifex. Since then, > you have been supporting us translators 24/7. I thank you so much from my > heart, can't say enough. > I support the move to zanata, but I don't think that our relationship is > fading out. > > > Robyn, thanks for copying trans at lists. > I believe that this (trans list) is the place to discuss and decide the > way we go as translators. > > Thanks again > > noriko > > > > (2014年07月10日 22:01), Robyn Bergeron wrote: > >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>> From: "Kevin Fenzi" <ke...@scrye.com> >>> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM >>> Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary >>> >>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200 >>> Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What are they? >>>>> >>>>> I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives but I am >>>>> aware of the following: >>>>> >>>>> http://zanata.org/ developed by Red Hat >>>>> >>>>> Translatewiki which is apparently what MediaGoblin is considering >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/913 >>>>> >>>> >>>> For the record, I support the move away from Transifex and will relay >>>> the sad news to the projects where I have before advice for it. >>>> >>>> The question is of course moving to what? That's something I cannot >>>> advice on atm. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah. There's also some more mentioned in the above mediagoblin ticket. >>> >>> Would someone care to look at them all and provide some summary about >>> each and how well they might work for our needs? >>> >> >> Copying the trans list since they probably have some good input about >> their needs :) (And nothing on this topic in their archives, not sure how >> much overlap between these two lists.) >> >> For the translations team's reference - https://lists.fedoraproject. >> org/pipermail/infrastructure/2014-July/014475.html is the original mail >> Rahul posted on the subject. >> >> -Robyn >> >> >>> kevin >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> infrastructure mailing list >>> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure >>> >> -- >> trans mailing list >> tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans >> >> > -- > trans mailing list > tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans >
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure