On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:51 AM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 13:40 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > > Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main > > > reason it was not included in the application we are currently working on > > > giving away / retiring. But to be honest I think the priority of the > > > packages > > > app is quite low. Following are some of the work we have in our Backlog : > > > • Packager UX improvement. > > > • FAS replacement. > > > • PDC replacement. > > > • OSBS support for aarch64. > > > • End to End testing and monitoring for the flatpak build pipeline. > > > • Package review process improvement. > > > • Fedora Infra technical debt. > > > > Is there somewhere community members can read more on these tasks of the > > CPE please? > > > > For the packages app---if it's in maintenance mode, I guess that's OK > > for the time being until something breaks. > > > > There are two aspects of the packages app that aren't available on > > src.fp.o that make it important for me: > > > > - bugz.fp.o/packagename -> but I expect this can be aliased to a direct > > bugzilla query type URL? "Open bugs" on the packages app heads to > > bugzilla already: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Fedora&product=Fedora+EPEL&component=python-rosinstall_generator&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED > > The feature this doesn't get you is the handy 'open a new bug for this > package' button. Which again can be replicated as a direct Bugzilla > link, but...you need at least a thing to serve a page showing those two > links :) >
I wonder if we can find some interest with other folks in other RPM distros with the packages app... There isn't much about it that is Fedora-specific. It doesn't even depend on Koji, which means people who use other tooling could use it. So building up a group interested could help with porting it to Python 3 and making it more configurable for usage by other distros (if any such work is needed). > > There are DDG bangs for bugzilla by the way but they don't search by > > component (I'll suggest a new one soon): !rbugs, !rhbz > > > > - "Install this package" -> this is critical. I was wondering if there > > was a way to allow users to "click to install", > > There is actually supposed to be a URI format that PackageKit-based > package managers should handle, IIRC, but that was a 2014-vintage thing > or something so no idea if it still works. It was never implemented as far as I know. That said, I had been recently talking to some folks at openSUSE about developing a new protocol to replace 1-Click-Install (ymp) and some of the other custom things being used. If this is something people want, it's something I can prioritize advancing. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
