Sure. Keeping the release mailing list in the loop as it requires action by the projects/PTLs.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 4:28 PM Anil Belur <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Abhijit: > > Please add this thread to the week's TSC call agenda and possibly take a > vote on this. > > 1. ODL Projects needs to vote (+1) before each of these change can be > merged on releng/builder. > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/85644 > 2. Agree upon a time when Sonarcube (https://sonar.opendaylight.org) can > be decommissioned. Please note, Sonarcloud has better features and language > support than SonarQube, and also remove the hosting and maintenance costs > associated with the SonarQube server. > > Thanks, > Anil > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:02 AM Eric Ball <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> We here at the LF Release Engineering team are working on a move from >> hosted SonarQube instances to the cloud-based Sonarcloud service. To that >> end, there is currently a proposed change to all Sonar jobs that would move >> them to Sonarcloud: >> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/85644 >> >> Sonarcloud has more features and better language support than SonarQube, >> and it will remove the hosting and maintenance costs associated with the >> SonarQube server. Our plan is to decommission the SonarQube server about a >> month after we make the move to Sonarcloud. >> >> You can view the OpenDaylight Sonarcloud page here: >> https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/opendaylight/projects >> Currently, the only projects showing results are those that have run and >> passed on the sandbox. Once the change is merged, all projects will show >> results after their next successful run. >> >> You may notice that while quantitative numbers like code coverage and >> duplication haven't changed, the number of bugs/vulnerabilities/code smells >> may have changed significantly (most likely an increase). This is due to >> Sonarcloud using much more up-to-date Quality Profiles than ODL's SonarQube >> instance, so this should be considered an improvement in results (even >> though I understand that it can be a pain to suddenly have a backlog of >> issues where there were few or none before). These profiles can be >> customized, so if anyone sees something coming up that absolutely should >> not be in the results, we can remove it from the Quality Profile. >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you'd like to bring >> this up for discussion during the next TSC meeting. >> >> Note: ovsdb is using a custom Sonar template. This will need to be >> changed to work with Sonarcloud, or (preferably) changed to use global-jjb >> templates. If there's something our global-jjb jobs do not currently >> support, we should be able to add that functionality. >> >> Eric Ball >> Release Engineer >> The Linux Foundation >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. >> >> View/Reply Online (#12181): >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/12181 >> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/44622856/1278122 >> Group Owner: [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub [ >> [email protected]] >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1132): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/infrastructure/message/1132 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/55342281/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/infrastructure/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
