On 14/01/2020 23:09, Anil Belur wrote: > Greetings Robert: Hey Anil,
sorry for the late reply. > Trying to catch up on where we are with the sonarcloud migrations. I > think another issue has been identified with 0% coverage, that is caused > by an update on the Java analyzer. Ah, good thing we did not do a straight-up migration then :) > With sonarcloud it's no longer possible to import jacoco.exec reports, > and the workaround suggested is to use XML format. This needs to be > fixed in the pom files. Okay, so if I am getting this correctly, this is covered in https://community.sonarsource.com/t/jacoco-coverage-reporting-differently-in-sonarcloud/8256 > Example on how this is fixed on an external project: > https://github.com/synyx/urlaubsverwaltung/pull/930/files Right, and an example is here: https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-scanning-examples/tree/master/sonarqube-scanner-maven/maven-multimodule, unfortunately it does cover the way we are doing things (i.e. top-level merged report *without* enumerating all artifacts as dependencies). I will need to look into this further. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1151): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/infrastructure/message/1151 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/44643180/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/infrastructure/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
