On 24/01/2020 08:16, Robert Varga wrote: > On 14/01/2020 23:09, Anil Belur wrote: >> Greetings Robert: > > Hey Anil, > > sorry for the late reply. > >> Trying to catch up on where we are with the sonarcloud migrations. I >> think another issue has been identified with 0% coverage, that is caused >> by an update on the Java analyzer. > > Ah, good thing we did not do a straight-up migration then :) > >> With sonarcloud it's no longer possible to import jacoco.exec reports, >> and the workaround suggested is to use XML format. This needs to be >> fixed in the pom files. > > Okay, so if I am getting this correctly, this is covered in > https://community.sonarsource.com/t/jacoco-coverage-reporting-differently-in-sonarcloud/8256 > >> Example on how this is fixed on an external project: >> https://github.com/synyx/urlaubsverwaltung/pull/930/files > > Right, and an example is here: > https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-scanning-examples/tree/master/sonarqube-scanner-maven/maven-multimodule, > unfortunately it does cover the way we are doing things (i.e. top-level > merged report *without* enumerating all artifacts as dependencies). > > I will need to look into this further.
Okay, I do have a prototype here: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/odlparent/+/88440 Can somebody test it, please? Thanks, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1152): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/infrastructure/message/1152 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/44643180/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/infrastructure/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
