Hi Guillermo:
>
> the product is ok but in my 1 year experience I had using mailmax was kind
> of bad.. the server crashed a lot specially on weekends :) the sql version
> was a beta so I cannot tell its bad but I can say one thing for sure.. IMS
> betas where 1000 more stable than mail max.
I never used it - but your experience seems to be exactly the same as all
those who I know who did. Mailmax should be fine though for 100 emails per
day :-)
iMS is unquestionably an infinitely more powerful and stable product.
>
> yes eric was the one giving support on mailmax with a programmer called
> jeff.. they have a good programming team but not for nothing but IMS is way
> faster and stable than ever.
Eric owns the company. but AFAIK he is no programmer. I agree with you
knowing all the facts - iMS and its support and people behind it are
infinitely superior.
Actually Guillermo we both seem to have followed parallel courses here! I had
alot of corrspondence with Ashley King about MrPost at one time (before he
went to work for Allaire I think, and discontinued it) and I already knew
about Mailmax through my past experiences with the company. It is clear that
we both, as do all on this list, recognise the significance of a
database-centric mailserver, particularly a CF based one - but_only_Howie and
iMS have been able to delive,r and will continue to do so.
Regards,
Adrian.
========================================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
'The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers'
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.CoolFusion.com/iMS.htm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
========================================================================
