I 2nd the boooo!
I dumped FusionMail after I saw it (no offense to Howie or whoever coded it). I did
build my own MTA around the "raw" iMS. I don't want iMS releases to be tied to FM
releases. I do have one comment regarding FM: Fusebox!
Cheers,
-Max
At 9/28/2000 05:41 PM -0400, ali jaffrey wrote:
>boooo!
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Adrian Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:36 PM
>Subject: Re: [iMS] iMS 1.5
>
>
>> Hi Howie:
>>
>> Sounds great - can hardly wait :-)
>>
>> I still think that you should converge FusionMail and iMS as a single,
>> installable product though, and keep the version numbers in sync. I
>realise
>> that they are technically supposed to be seperate products, but the
>reality is
>> that not many people (if any) would take the raw iMS and build an MTA
>around
>> it - I would suggest that most either use FusionMail or a development of
>> FusionMail to make iMS work. People can still take the templates to modify
>as
>> they like. I also think it would cause less confusion, and make for a
>complete
>> product to sell.
>>
>> Just my 2p/c on the subject since you mention it anyway.
>>
>> Adrian.
>>
>>
========================================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
'The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers'
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.CoolFusion.com/iMS.htm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
========================================================================
