> >you reckon that seperating SQL and its effective clients would what, speed
> >things up, reduce the resource overhead, all of the above? Not
> >disputing this -
> >but would like more evidence.
>
> Sorry, this is self-evident. vbg
To you maybe!
>
> Adding a second web mail box would need a 2nd URL, or do you plan to
> use some kind of application level load balancer in from the 2 or
> more web mail boxes?
Yes - my ethernet switch can do that seemlessly.
> >
> >I doubt it. Every incoming message as well as writing a file to the mail
> >directory also writes an entry to the SQL Server "mail" table.
>
> omygod, you're storing the mailboxes in SQL tables? How you you
> handle 5 megabyte attachements?
That's not what I said. I said that each incoming message writes a reference to
the SQL database - not the entire message.
>
> I will have to go study up on RAID10.
I suggest you study up on iMS and SQL while you are about it!
Adrian.
========================================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
'The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers'
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.CoolFusion.com/iMS.htm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
========================================================================
