Ya'll,
What is the overall opinion of moving toward sending multipart alternative
(with a text and html format) for all emails versus, making a specific text
and specific html format?
Our email system is becoming too difficult to manage and I am looking for
ways that we can consolidate code and streamline our process.
If we went with multipart-alternative we could eliminate about 50% of the
code in file that processes our email as it also needs to contain the code
for processing plain text and html only emails and in three different
formats (cfx tag with no dynamic content, cfx tag with cfloop and dynamic
content, and our homegrown cffile and cfloop system - used about 90% of the
time - for highly dynamic emails with personalized tracking images and
tracking links).
The "Pros" of multipart-alternative are obvious, but what are the deal
stopping "Cons"?
Matt Boyce
==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^=======================================================
