Sorry, hotmail screwed that up. To clear things up:
I am sending personalised mail in the sense that you mean - I have one
recipient per control file. I do not want to change this. What
bottlenecks am I running into? At what rate could I reasonably expect
to send out emails, given these constraints - has anyone ever tried it?
iMS allows you to send personalized mail without
making separate control files by using tokens or Qtokens. However, if
the server can connect to a responsive server then a typical email will go
through in a few seconds (1-4). The only way to really see what is
happening is to examine the log file. You can send it to me if you
want (or a portion of it where you think a delay is happening) and I'll look
at it.
Regards,
Howie
I am using the Enterprise (2.1.15) version of iMS.
I am sending mail to multiple mail servers over a LAN.
>From: "Matthew Boyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>howie,
>
>yossi said they are not making personalized and that this is
not a creation
>of mail issue. it is a sending issue.
>
>matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:17 AM
> To: inFusion Support List
> Subject: Re: [iMS] Thrashing iMS
>
>
> Are you sending personalized mails? Personalized mails are
always slow
>because each recipient gets a copy of the mail whereas a
static message gets
>delivered to several recipients at once.
>
> You also lost delivery speed for static messages if you
looping over the
>cfx and creating control files with a single recipient in
them.
>
> Regards,
>
> Howie
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Yossi Mills
> To: inFusion Support List
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [iMS] Thrashing iMS
>
>
> "failto" and "warnto" are both set to null. I'm running two
separate
>mail servers (one is a dual-processor), each running 255
threads, allowing
>simultaneous connections. There is no appreciable difference
when I send to
>only one server. Furthermore, when we did a large sendout to
"the world"
>(running 255 threads) we only got about 600-700/minute. What
am I doing
>wrong?
>
> And WE ARE NOT SPOOLING. What we do is spool say, 10,000
messages, turn
>off spooling, then turn on POST. Hence, POST runs at the
maximum speed
>possible on our configuration. I am speaking about SENDING
emails, not
>creating them.
>
>
> This list server is Powered by iMS
> "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list please complete the form at
>http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
> Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license
here:
>http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
> List archives:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
> Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>==^=======================================================
> This list server is Powered by iMS
> "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
> --------------------------------------
>To leave this list please complete the form at
>http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
>Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license
here:
>http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
>List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
>Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>==^=======================================================
>
